Typical scenarios within this site’s subject: questions to ask, materials to prepare and points that can be examined.
Typical scenarios
Suppose the conclusion names one object while photographs and tables in an appendix use another designation. This could be a drafting error or a material gap between the examination and the answer.
Typical scenarios
If the remedial-work amount in the conclusions differs from the sum of the appendix items, the calculation sequence needs to be reconstructed. A different table version, rounding, duplicated work or an omitted explanation may account for the difference. The discrepancy alone does not establish which amount is justified.
