review.moscowExpert report reviews

How to recognise that an examination may be flawed

Signs of a weak report: incomplete input data, contradictions, no methodology, conclusions without supporting examination and matters beyond the questions posed.

Common signs

  • the conclusions do not follow from the examination section;
  • the expert has not described the object and input data;
  • documents, photographs, contracts and records have not been taken into account;
  • there is no methodology or assessment criteria;
  • the questions posed have not been answered;
  • the expert has exceeded the scope of their competence.
Inquiry

Submit the report and your questions to the expert

An initial assessment requires: the expert's or specialist's report, the court order or contract, the questions posed, appendices, photographs, documents and your position in the dispute.

  • identifying methodological and logical errors;
  • checking the completeness of input data;
  • analysing whether the conclusions are substantiated;
  • preparing questions for the expert;
  • materials for a repeat or additional examination.

Up to 10 files of 10 MB each, with a total limit of 15 MB. Submit the complete report, including appendices and questions for the expert. Arrange submission of larger materials separately.

How data is processed: Personal Data Processing Policy. Attach only materials relevant to the examination; redact unnecessary data about other people.

Up to 10 files of 10 MB each, with a total limit of 15 MB. Attach the complete report with appendices and questions for the expert; arrange submission of larger materials separately.

Attachments: up to 10 files of up to 10 MB each, with a maximum combined size of 15 MB. If a file is rejected, the enquiry is not sent.

Reviews of studies and forensic examinations — review.moscow+7 965 751 2580
CallWrite to usDiscuss your task ↗